Brazil, Brazil 2017, Red Knot, rural communities, Shorebird

Our Brazilian Expedition – The Rights of Traditional Communities


Previous Post

Over the last few days of our expedition, we left the state of Para and flew to Sao Luis in the adjacent state of Maranhao.  There we begin the next phase of our work, trapping red knots, ruddy turnstones and other species, as we have done since 2014.



Our work in Maranhao includes trapping ruddy turnstones and red knots to recover geolocators attached in 2013 and 2014. Thus far we have recovered 25. This bird, with a blue leg flag inscribed with C37 has two years of flight information.


Traditional Communities Have Rights

But prior to leaving Para, while we stayed in the village of Apiu Salvatore, the fishermen asked to meet with Max.  He hadn’t planned it, so at first, the reason was unknown. The fishermen of the village knew Max represented ICMBio, and that Apiu Salvatore fell within Resex Gurupi-Piria, one of the Brazilian agency’s many extractive or Resex reserves.  As I described in the first of this series, ICMBio conserves natural resources in each reserve for the benefit of traditional communities, such as this one. So Max had a good idea what the community had on their mind



David and Danielle prepare for the meeting with the fishermen of Apiu Salvadori.



We entered the large open meeting space under a thatch roof with a good breeze cooled by a sudden evening downpour.  The association leader, Antonio asked that we sit on four plastic chairs in the center of the room.  I felt more embarrassment than fear because  I neglected to dispose of my half open beer when Max suddenly asked if I wanted to attend.  So there was I, the only American on the dais, sporting a can of Skol.  After a nearly formal sign-in of every one of the 30 of so people in attendance, we introduced ourselves and spent some time explaining our purpose.  Max spoke of the reserve system, Danielle of the migrant shorebirds, Carlos David of his University.  I spoke of nothing, too ashamed of my country and my president.

Than Antonio got down to business.  He explained the problem of the immense ships lurking offshore, spreading giant purse seines or immense lines of baited hooks, and stealing all the fish.  It threatened their own lives, not only their livelihoods but their very existence. One could see very clearly how vital fish were to these fishermen.  The community consumed virtually no goods, most of their daily needs came from the sea or their backyards. Chickens, pigs, even lambs filled backyards.  Fruit like mangos and avocados literally fell from the trees. I saw no washing machines, microwaves, coffeemakers, or nearly any of the appliances that litter a typical US kitchen.

There was one modern device found in every hut and cabin, no matter how small or dilapidated, all had TVs.  How, I imagine, can they fit in this primitive world while gapping at the lives of the rich and famous?  These were not people ignorant of the world, but unfortunately, they could be innocent as lambs when faced with the greedy schemers and politicians of Brazil. A group not unlike our own.

So it is understandable that the fishermen’s first thought was to go to the Catholic Church. But then we came.  So they asked for Max’s advice.



The people of the village live simply with no luxuries except TVs. The town, located on a small island has no electricity except when the community generator is turned on at night. (photo by C Buiden)


He quickly determined They had no idea they had legal rights to the fishery.  He patiently explained the concept of ICMBio reserve system, the system of which they are a part.   In theory, they could unify and certify their observations, take it to a judge and get a decision that would force the government to stop the theft by the international fishing fleet.  At least In principle.   Max and Danielle explained these rights and the group seemed sufficiently inspired. At least they left happy.


Reserve Managers Need More Resources Get Less


Why did they not know their rights?  Max explained to me, that the reserve manager for this area covered 60 other villages and that ICMBio has suffered 3 years of budget cuts.  He reminded me how long it took to get to this village. So it’s the usual story familiar to US agency biologists.  In the US, the conservatives call it starving the beast of government.  Here the impact of underfunded government agencies has a more obvious impact. Starving good government only starves the people who live on the land, the land itself and the wildlife, who depend upon it.  It’s similar in the rural areas of US but with less obvious consequences.





For me, it meant something more.  We proposed this project to create better protection for shorebirds.  We took the usual approach.  First, do the surveys then will create scientifically defensible descriptions of the habitat’s value.  Finally, we overlay the threats: shrimp farming, oil spills, human disturbance, predators etc. and develop counter-measures.


I learned that night that there only one threat in this, one of the most important shorebird habitats in the world.  It looms large above all others –  if you erode ICMBio’s system of protection all the other threats will grow and decimate the fragile ecology of the area.  Grow the ICMbio system and the traditional communities will enforce their legal right to conserve.  They can monitor the threats and work with the agency to stop them.  The laws already exist.  The monitoring system is already in place.  But this meeting pointed out they need more help.

Next Post





photos by C. Buidin